MetroRiderLA

[Note: The entry's time was set too early and it was released incomplete. The time is reset to reflect the complete version.]

BART is a two-rail monorail.

The thesis is cold but succinct, but its simplicity is apt for a rapid transit system that is more complex, more complicated and more burdensome than it has to be. Even BART’s successes and strong points must be couched with qualifiers that almost cancel out its merits. BART is a true regional network serving four counties, but it’s a special district that has prerogatives different from — and usually in conflict with — the communities it serves. BART’s ridership demonstrates its success, but expanding service using its proprietary equipment — from its broad gauge to the one-of-a-kind cars and automated control system — is unnecessarily expensive. BART can command a premium price for service and boasts a remarkable farebox recovery of over 50 percent, but the logic behind the prices is twisted to incomprehensibility (demonstrated below). BART is often held up as a model for how a comprehensive mass transit system should be built in the future, but the farsighted designs of space-age planning are now considered archaic and impractical.

Might as well build the guideway as a monorail at this point. BART has much in common with monorails — way too much. BART, with two rails, is working proof of the folly of monorails. BART was conceived and designed by engineers with no reference to other disciplines and dynamics of passenger transportation. It was very much a product of the then-contemporary fashion of the scientific community: The past is a closed door, and the future begins today. Everything about BART seems to emit an aura of public transportation of, by and for people with utter disdain for it. It’s a train meant to make all other vehicle before it be eaten, digested and defecated by history. The engineers and planners were given free rein to reinvent the wheel and the stone age while they were at it. Rights of way were plentiful, but the new cars could not run on them, so virgin guideways were built. The Transbay Tube is a testament to ingenuity, but it replaced an equally effective and comprehensive streetcar system that ran above the water on the Bay Bridge. Plus, the whole point of the wider gauge was so the trains could cross the Golden Gate Bridge, which was later ruled to be impossible physically and politically — Marin County opted out of the BART district when it had the chance in 1962 and even four decades later maintains the Bay Area’s worst public transit. The district itself reflected a “the good is the enemy of the perfect, but the good-enough is the enemy of the good” compromise, where a new agency was created because none of the existing systems at the time would merge or cooperate to bring BART to fruition. So a separate entity was created parallel to available bus and train systems, but the prerogatives of BART and transit agency managers were different and in direct conflict.

Sir Peter Hall cited BART as one of five examples in “Great Planning Disasters”, published in 1980. Almost 30 years later, BART is 104 miles and has a weekday ridership of over 300,000. That’s a catastrophic success.

Go, go gadget bahn.

(more…)