L.A. Times likes fare hikes, hates carpool lanes
Added on Saturday, January 27th, 2007Los Angeles Times had two transportation editorials this week. On January 26, the editorial board supported raising bus and train fares for Metro customers. Excerpts:
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority hasn’t raised single-ride fares since 1995; adjusting for inflation, local transit riders are paying 20% less than they did a dozen years ago. … To maintain service on a budget deep in the red, the MTA has raided its maintenance budget, pared its administration and depleted its reserves.
…
With roughly 450 million transit rides a year, a modest increase in daily fares and monthly passes could go a long way. Still, to balance the budget, some service also will have to be cut.
On January 23 the editorial board also came out against Los Angeles County’s high-occupancy-vehicle lane network, the largest in the nation. It believes the carpool lanes are only used because children are counted as occupants, as well as single-occupant hybrid automobile drivers. Excerpts:
L.A. County’s network of carpool lanes is among the nation’s most extensive. Yet, according to the U.S. census … carpooling has declined — from 20% of commuters in 1980 to 12% in 2000.
The reasons for this are anyone’s guess, but it’s clear that carpool lanes aren’t doing a good job of getting people out of their cars at rush hour.
Research shows that most of the people who use carpool lanes … aren’t teaming up to get to work. They’re usually families going to school, the mall or somewhere else. A mom who is allowed to use the carpool lane because she’s got an infant strapped in the back seat is not helping to get cars off the road; that kid wasn’t going to be driving even if he weren’t sharing a ride.







