
Photo by Fred Camino via Flickr. This and other photos can be seen on the MetroRiderLA Flickr pool.
First of all, my apologies to MetroReaders.
I had promised a quick and orderly turnaround for this Open Source Transit series, which covers how LADOT could refocus its DASH service in light of projected funding shortfalls. The problem: Open Source Transit does not lend itself to quick turnarounds. Alas, the posts here will show it.
Google Maps, which has a useful tool to draw lines on local roads, has been very buggy. Many times I have had to redraw routes all over because the lines would disappear for no apparent reason. Also, the line draw tool has a bad habit of shifting away from streets on its own. Third, drawing more than just a few routes has been a serious drain on memory. I didn’t see this problem when I had done the Transit Service Interface Proposals for the Eastside Gold Line and the Expo Line.
I have to push the schedule back for these releases. The revised schedule will be one DASH restructuring per week. This week, I will “start” with the Eastside. It is simply a repost of the route suggestions LADOT should consider to interface with the Gold Line. There are three routes, and I will repost the proposals in a new thread to open up new discussions.
I am also going to allow this to become truly Open Source Transit for you MetroReaders. Google Maps has a collaborate feature. If you wish to draw your own routes and have them included with these proposals, I can add you as a collaborator. Get a Google Maps account and then send us an e-mail.
Now then, we have a very busy week of transit ahead of us. L.A. is eagerly anticipating the opening of the Eastside Gold Line, with free rides this Sunday (and Sunday only). Orange County transit users, though, are in the fight of their lives. They have the unenviable task of stopping OCTA‘s bus service cuts that would take the county back to mid-1970s levels. We may have much to celebrate, but we should also help out Orange County riders in any way we can.
Back to the task at hand. The overarching theme is for LADOT, outside of downtown L.A., to run bus service in place of low-ridership Metro lines rather than duplicating portions of productive lines.
Wouldn’t this put LADOT into a deeper hole? That may weigh on planners and politicians’ minds. This edition of Open Source Transit, though, instead looks at the current DASH system as focusing too much money and energy to fill its buses by poaching Metro of its local ridership. If LADOT would be forced to cancel all DASH service, L.A. riders would still have Metro available. However, Metro is facing the same cuts, and it will go after its weakest performing routes first. If these disappear, riders who used these lines would have nothing in their place.
LADOT’s cheaper operations, roughly half the cost of Metro’s service, can help salvage lines and build a ridership base to sustain them. LADOT, and especially DASH, are also more liked among riders than Metro. People would be more willing to use these services.
So what are the next steps? The prologue suggests two steps LADOT should take in order to revamp its local shuttle services: 1)a rebranding away from the DASH name, and 2) a fare structure that would be higher than the 25 cents for most DASH buses now but lower than the $1.25 Metro cash fare.
(more…)