Focus on the fundamentals
Added on Wednesday, April 4th, 2007[tags]transit, michael setty, toronto, edmonton[/tags]

Los Angeles and Toronto have many surprising similarities
Credit: Kevin Steele via Flickr (Creative Commons license)
It’s not the size of the train, it’s the motion of the motion.
Michael Setty of Publictransit.us unearthed a document that’s 30 years old but still remains surprisingly relevant to this today. A 1976 lecture by Greg Thompson, Jas Kooner, and Rudy Massman said that the key to making transit usable is not capital-intensive megaprojects or high-technology snake oil. Instead, it is “management operating and planning technique is the more important variable for high ridership transit … .”
Case studies used in Thompson et al are the Canadian metropoles Toronto, Edmonton and Vancouver, with some references to practices in European cities. Keep in mind that Toronto has a legacy system with most of the rail lines that run today operational at the time of the study, while Edmonton and Vancouver were bus-only cities that later on built rail lines.
The cities focused on making sure travel movement is efficient throughout the service area. In contrast, many North American cities that rely on radial route structures are consigned to a fate of chronically low transit usage.
As any coach will say, “you’ve gotta have the fundamentals in place.”
And reading Thompson et al, Toronto’s transit environment has many similarities with Los Angeles. Don’t laugh. Here’s why.





