Pasadena, not Manhattan
Added on Sunday, August 26th, 2007[tags]los angeles, urban planning, bill fulton, joel kotkin[/tags]

Pasadena’s beautiful City Hall is one of many beautiful buildings in a city that arguably is the one to be emulated by urban planning. Find more images in Flickr’s Pasadena photo pool.
Credit: Lush.i.ous via Flickr (Creative Commons license)
It only took a week for Bill Fulton to rebut Joel Kotkin in the same pages of the Los Angeles Times that L.A. is not “Manhattanizing,” but more, umm … “Pasadenaizing.” Kotkin chided Los Angeles for, gasp, too much density and it spawned a small dust storm of a meme.
Fulton, who maintains a blog on the California Policy & Development Report web site, is president of Ventura-based Solimar Research Group, a senior scholar at the USC School of Policy, Planning, and Development and most famously, author of such books as “The Reluctant Metropolis” and “California: Land and Legacy”. In this week’s op-ed, Fulton points out that L.A. has multiple centers stemming from a planning vision in the 1970s to disperse small high-density commercial centers throughout the city. And density clustering like barnacales on a ship outside of the city’s general plan had to do with developers subsidizing City Council races in exchange for building “outside of the box.” Even other municipalities are growing up with low-rise buildings and walkable communities, with Pasadena serving as the prototype.
In the past week, here’s how the Fulton vs. Kotkin meme evolved:
- Kotkin: Why the rush to Manhattanize L.A.? (linked above)
- Fulton: It’s time to de-Kotkinize the planning debate
- Curbed LA was burning up with this feud
- Joel Kotkin: What you’re for, I’m against
- Joel Kotkin defenders UNITE!
- Friday morning linkage on August 24, 2007 plugging to our site’s two cents.
- Fulton in the L.A. Times: “We’re Pasadena-izing” (linked above)
- LAist: How LA became, well, LA — A Partial Planning History






