Addition to the MetroRider lexicon

Contributed by Wad on August 13th, 2007 at 1:30 am

[tags]public transit, sacramento, sacramento rt, rt rider[/tags]

Transitarian.

Credit goes to the Sacramento equivalent of this site, RT Rider. The definition, as coined by the blogger:

A transitarian is so enamored with transit, so invested in the good that comes from leaving the car at home, that he takes light rail … and then walks nine blocks in the rain to get to an important appointment … . [Edited to remove local references.]

A transitarian, therefore, often resembles a drowned rat, his jacket soaked through, his slacks wet from midthigh down to his squishy-wet shoes. But inside, beneath that wet exterior, is a proud transitarian … .

So far, the meme has stayed local within Sacramento, spread by the efforts of a kindred spirit to the RT Rider site, RT Driver. Although, Blogger users who dig reading profiles can find the original article via a link on John’s (RT Rider blogger) short bio.

There’s more than a fair share of transitarians in L.A., too. Many of them are probably reading this site as we speak.

Discussion

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Please keep discussions civil: exercise Troll Controll.

There are 16 Responses to “Addition to the MetroRider lexicon”:

  1. Transitarian has been around for more than a decade in my personal experience. IIRC Tom Rubin once used the term quite often. Eventually it was culturalized and radicalized to the more recent term; transitista.

    You cannot cheat an honest man and you cannot educate an avowed modalist be they bicyclist or transitista [or autoholic for that matter]. - Rob Dawg Feb 2004

    Comment by Rob Dawg on August 13th, 2007 at 8:22 am »Reply« resta suma

  2. When I first used the term “transitarian” I did some Googling and Asking and whatever you call that Microsoft search service.

    There were lots of Spanish-language hits (third-person plural of transitar in the conditional) but no English usage.

    Personally, I prefer transitarian to transitista. It goes better with the tie.

    Comment by John on August 13th, 2007 at 11:13 am »Reply« resta suma

  3. I prefer to think of us an elite group… the transirati. :)

    Comment by FredCamino on August 13th, 2007 at 11:16 am »Reply« resta suma

  4. Transitarian? Transirati? Both are okay. I just hope it doesn’t become one of those “Trekkies” vs. “Trekkers” bones of contention.

    Comment by Donald Stanwood on August 13th, 2007 at 12:21 pm »Reply« resta suma

  5. I just hope it doesn’t become one of those “Trekkies” vs. “Trekkers” bones of contention.

    I imagine in terms of sheer nerdiness it’s a very similar argument.

    Comment by FredCamino on August 13th, 2007 at 1:05 pm »Reply« resta suma

  6. [Wearing my grouch hat]

    I think it’s a way to discourage people from taking transit by making it sound like it’s only for a small dedicated group of elites….

    It’s another example of the mainstream media passing off fluff as news and fabricating social trends….

    [Taking off my grouch-hat now]

    Comment by raphaelmazor on August 13th, 2007 at 2:49 pm »Reply« resta suma

  7. Mainstream media? Did Murdoch buy out rtrider.blogspot.com?!?! What next man!???????? Is nothing sacred?

    Comment by FredCamino on August 13th, 2007 at 3:53 pm »Reply« resta suma

  8. cartarded

    Comment by Matt Walsh on August 13th, 2007 at 6:37 pm »Reply« resta suma

  9. Oh, I think I was confusing it with an article I’d read in the LA Times…. I’ll see if I can dig it up….

    Comment by raphaelmazor on August 13th, 2007 at 11:49 pm »Reply« resta suma

  10. Oh, and from a purely linguistic point of view, I love “cartarded” and “autoholic”, even if they make light of seriously debilitating mental illnesses.

    Comment by raphaelmazor on August 13th, 2007 at 11:51 pm »Reply« resta suma

  11. Re; autoholic. Next thing you know air breathers will be reclassified as oxygen dependency addicts.

    Comment by Rob Dawg on August 14th, 2007 at 7:29 am »Reply« resta suma

  12. It’s sad that “cars” and “oxygen” are equivalents to Rob Dawg (and most others). I think Maslow needs to update his hierarchy of needs, he neglected “automotive needs” which I believe sneaks in just before “biological needs”.

    Comment by FredCamino on August 14th, 2007 at 8:26 am »Reply« resta suma

  13. Awww Fred, get a your smile on. I’m the one that first mentioned autoholic in this thread and I did so in a negative context.

    Comment by Rob Dawg on August 14th, 2007 at 9:30 am »Reply« resta suma

  14. Did you make it up, Rob? It is pretty clever.

    Comment by raphaelmazor on August 14th, 2007 at 9:51 am »Reply« resta suma

  15. Oh yaaaaaaa… I gotta read these things before I comment :)

    Comment by FredCamino on August 14th, 2007 at 10:59 am »Reply« resta suma

  16. Yes, first noted Feb 2004. Feel free to use/steal it.

    Comment by Rob Dawg on August 14th, 2007 at 11:06 am »Reply« resta suma